Moto - Music - Miscellany - Politics
The Cascade Curtain
One of the things I’ve always wanted to do was a video project that addressed the political divide of Washington State, infamously known as the “Cascade Curtain”. And so I’ve begun…
I’ve taken some footage but nothing too significant so far… until last week when I attended Dino Rossi’s visit to Kennewick.
Despite my obvious left leaning bias, I don’t intend to pick on Rossi exclusively. In fact, I’d pick on any pol that perpetuates what I feel is an artificial political divide.
With that said, there is obviously a constituency on the east side of the mountains that has adopted a more conservative stance. But looking at it from a more pragmatic perspective, moderates in both parties are pretty well tuned in to their constituency when we get right down to it, and either party can provide the necessary balance needed given the proper environment. But all too often, divide and conquer is the status quo.
In my own run at Richland’s City Council, I looked at the possibility of a win with the thought that it would be my job to absolutely represent my city regardless of my political leanings. Doing less isn’t genuine. But the bottom line in my political leanings would be to get the ideas out there, see the response and govern accordingly. We simply don’t get enough of that.
When I went to the Dino Rossi event in Kennewick last Wednesday, I brought my camera and set up to record the event. After getting initial permission (I asked), when Dino came to speak I was abruptly asked to turn off the camera. Disappointing, yet interesting to note that earlier that day, Christine Gregoire spoke in Kennewick… with camera’s everywhere.
Looking around, I could tell I wasn’t the only one recording either audio or video (I just happened to have a professional setup so I was obvious), so I captured a few clips with my handheld camera. The speech wasn’t that dramatic and nothing really noteworthy was said except what was truly relevant to my project. Thus the following entry in the ongoing saga.
So, do we have a “Seattle Chip” on our shoulder? What do you think?
My feeling is that this is largely perpetuated by political speak in an effort to create an “us vs. them” attitude. When reality suggests (as well as state govt. spending) that this is merely a tool for political gain.
What do you think?
I’ll continue to post on this and I sincerely hope that the Rossi folks will be less reclusive in their campaign.
Comments are closed.

December 16, 2007 - 8:36 pm
Looks to me like this guy’s trying to divide people. Maybe it will get him votes. But it’s not going to help the state.
December 17, 2007 - 9:56 am
Rossi’s campaigning should give people an indication of the type of Governor he would be. Your comment that after you got permission to record the event you were “abruptly asked to turn off the camera” is a bad sign. If the candidate and his campaign are so afraid to have recorded what he says publicly, you can just image the type of Governor he would be. Don’t expect that it would be an open government. His past campaigning and lack of taking positions on important issues indicates that he doesn’t really want you to know where he stands on the issues; he thinks by not taking positions publicly that he can let the voters imagine he is for them. Do voters really want to take a chance on electing someone who won’t tell them where he stands on the issues?
Rossi would not publicly state where he stood on a number of public issues like the 2005 ballot measure to raise gas taxes 9.5 cents and the 2007 roads and transit measure. When asked he said he had not made up his mind on I-960 to require 2/3 votes by the Legislature to raise revenue. This is a leader - someone who is unwilling to stick his neck out and take a position on major issues facing the state?
And what confidence does he now show in his own campaigning if he is afraid to let it be recorded?
December 17, 2007 - 12:20 pm
While the idea of examining the Cascade Curtain, the “us vs. them”, or as I like to think of it the Star-Bellied Sneetch parable…I think you’re right that it does come down largely where the moderates sit.
Righties and lefties are going to bluster and try to move that line, but why is the people in the middle look at both sides and think the world would be far better off if people weren’t so obsessed with trying to label things? I think it’s because the moderates think about things in a more considered, pragmatic, and thoughtful way. While I know there’s sometimes a Seattle attitude or “chip” I don’t think of it is any larger than the sometimes Eastern Washington “hick” factor….both of which are easily assailable in almost any conversation of substance.
And I would think a part of your exploration would be on the issue of “context” and appropriateness. Rossi, Gregoire, whoever….will never be all things to all people. Your video is for all intents and purposes is a gathering of Republicans for the purposes of fund raising. (I know, I got an invite and didn’t go because Rossi’s retread campaign isn’t doing it for me any more than Craswell or Carlson did)
Seems like they were rather polite and could (or should) have asked you if you were a Republican and either tossed you or asked where your donation was.
And if these specific-audience appearances are to become parsed in the public domain….why not go all the way? When’s Gregoire’s campaign committee strategic meetings going to be on YouTube? Where’s Rossi’s conversations with his neighbor Buener? Or how about one-on-one conversations with constituents?
Do we want to be so open as to Truman Show the whole campaign experience? Take public disclosure to the nth degree and include all e-mail, phone calls, and conversations and make them all public?
I’m not sure I know the answer myself, but will be interested to see how you move through this issue Jim.